{"id":457,"date":"2012-06-29T15:32:17","date_gmt":"2012-06-29T15:32:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/?p=457"},"modified":"2012-06-29T15:32:17","modified_gmt":"2012-06-29T15:32:17","slug":"social-media-explodes-over-health-care-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/?p=457","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p> Ever wonder what your clients are thinking or saying about a particular issue? Social media makes it easy to find out as proven by the number of tweets,  posts,  blogs,  etc that were devoted to Thursday&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act.  Naturally,  it&#8217;s helpful to know how your clients feel about certain issues,  but it&#8217;s also good to know how they are expressing themselves.  Deanne Katz&#8217;s article,  <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.findlaw.com\/technologist\/2012\/06\/everyone-has-a-social-media-opinion-on-the-health-care-ruling.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FLTechnologist+%28Technologist%29\">&#8220;Everyone Has a Social Media Opinion on the Health Care Ruling, &#8221;<\/a> examines some of those comments.<\/p>\n<p><div itemprop=\"aggregateRating\" itemscope=\"itemscope\" itemtype=\"http:\/\/schema.org\/AggregateRating\">Average Rating: <span itemprop=\"ratingValue\">4.8<\/span> out of <span itemprop=\"bestRating\">5<\/span> based on <span itemprop=\"reviewCount\">259<\/span> user reviews.<\/span><\/div><\/p><p>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"http:\/\/schema.org\/\",\n  \"@type\": \"Review\",\n\"datePublished\":\"May 2, 2026\",\n  \"itemReviewed\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Product\",\n    \"name\": \"Male Enhancement Pills\"\n  },\n  \"reviewRating\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Rating\",\n    \"ratingValue\": \"4.8\"\n  },\n\n  \"author\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"LegitScript\"\n  },\n  \"reviewBody\": \"Excellent quality at low price. Very good customer service.\",\n  \"publisher\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n    \"name\": \"LegitScript\"\n  }\n}\n<\/script><div id=\"mlnks\" class=\"entry-meta\"><p>[ <a href=\"\/\" title=\"\"><\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/\" title=\"\"><\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/\" title=\"\"><\/a> | <a href=\"\/-\" title=\" \"> <\/a> | <a href=\"\/\" title=\"\"><\/a> ]<\/p><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ever wonder what your clients are thinking or saying about a particular issue? Social media makes it easy to find out as proven by the number of tweets, posts, blogs, etc that were devoted to Thursday&#8217;s Supreme Court ruling on &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/?p=457\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[214,23,215,37,11,35,38,29,26,14,33,13,19,90,28,18],"class_list":["post-457","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-affordable-care-act","tag-bloggers","tag-clients","tag-courts","tag-facebook","tag-first-amendment","tag-free-speech","tag-law-firms","tag-linkedin","tag-mobile-applications","tag-myspace","tag-social-media","tag-social-media-policy","tag-tumblr","tag-twitter","tag-united-states-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=457"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/457\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":458,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/457\/revisions\/458"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.socialmedialaw.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}