US protections for Free Speech may keep Facebook from having to adhere to new EU laws. Dinah Greek looks at how “EU Data Privacy Directive Loophole Affects Social Networking Sites.”

Average Rating: 5 out of 5 based on 288 user reviews.

Michael McHugh looks at how much social media and its users are worth in “One Facebook User = Two LinkedIn Users, and Other Things the Stock Market Tells Us.”

Average Rating: 4.9 out of 5 based on 182 user reviews.

The rules for online defamation may be a matter for individual courts to determine according to “Online Defamation: Is it Any Different?” by Steven Price. Like many issues in cyberspace, defamation is still being defined and refined in the online environment.

Average Rating: 4.4 out of 5 based on 243 user reviews.

The US government wants to be able to mine all social media more efficiently in the name of national security. In addition to privacy concerns, are issues with finding software that can accurately determine risks. Marcus Wohlsen of the Associated Press reports in “US Government Seeks to Mine Social Media to Help Predict Future.”

Average Rating: 4.4 out of 5 based on 284 user reviews.

By Michael Kernan

Today’s post is the handout from a 2011 Continuing Legal Education seminar I gave on Social Media for California attorneys.

ATTORNEY BLOGS AND SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES IN CALIFORNIA

S. Michael Kernan, Adjunct Professor, University of California Hastings

Attorney communications and solicitations in California are governed by the California Business and Professions Code and the California Rules of Professional Conduct (CRPC) of the State Bar.

KEY TERMS: 

An “advertisement” is:

“…any communication, disseminated by television or radio, by any print medium, including, but not limited to, newspapers and billboards, or by means of a mailing directed generally to members of the public and not to a specific person, that solicits employment of legal services provided by a member, and is directed to the general public and is paid for by, or on behalf of, an attorney.[1]

A “communication” relevant to social media is:

“…any message or offer made by or on behalf of a member concerning the availability for professional employment of a member or a law firm directed to any former, present, or prospective client, including but not limited to the following:

(3) Any advertisement (regardless of medium) of such member or law firm directed to the general public or any substantial portion thereof; or

(4) Any unsolicited correspondence from a member or law firm directed to any person or entity.”[2]

A “solicitation” is:

“…any communication:

(1) Concerning the availability for professional employment of a member  or a law firm in which a significant motive is pecuniary gain; and

(2) Which is:

(a) delivered in person or by telephone, or

(b) directed by any means to a person known to the sender to be represented by counsel in a matter which is a subject of the communication.”[3]

 

PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN THE NEW MILLENIUM

 Websites And Social Media Pages

Electronic communications disseminated by “television, radio, or computer networks” are subject to special regulations.[4] Social networks or computer networks are not specifically defined.  As explained in a leading treatise, California Practice Guide: Professional Responsibility:

“Regulation of electronic media advertising by lawyers extends to advertising on television and radio as well as computer networks. It includes use of the Internet (e.g., active and passive Web sites, online referral services, “chat room” communications and e-mail), text messaging and other forms of electronic communication.[5]

Citing the United States Supreme Court case of Central Hudson Gas & Elec. Corp. v. Public Service Comm’n of New York[6] that treatise suggests that, while the state has not clearly regulated websites and pages on social media, it would be improper to regulate an attorney’s blog or social media website that is “informational”.[7]

It explains:

“A Web site deemed predominately ‘informational’ (as opposed to commercial) would warrant greater protection under the First Amendment.”[8]

Thus, your Website or Social Media page should be primarily informational to avoid potential ethics issues.

 

 ARE BLOGS OR SOCIAL MEDIA PAGES CONSIDERED ADVERTISEMENTS?

The California Practice Guide: Professional Responsibility states:

“Legal ‘blogs’: The extent to which legal “blogs” (or “blawgs”) are subject to lawyer advertising rules in California has not been addressed. Material posted on a lawyer’s blog could be considered a “communication” (¶ 2:76 ff.) or an “advertisement” (¶ 2:39 ff.) depending upon the context of the message (see2:6.6 ff. re “hybrid” speech)[9].

Social networking sites: Social networking sites are web-based communities of people with shared interests. Examples include MySpace, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Classmates Online, Windows Live Spaces, AOL Hometown, Club Penguin, LinkedIn, Legal OnRamp and LawLink.  These sites may include chats, instant messaging, video, e-mail, discussion groups, blogs and other communication forms. To the extent a lawyer makes contact with a prospective client on such a site, the advertising and solicitation rules would almost certainly apply.

 

PRACTICE POINTERS: If you choose to hang your shingle in cyberspace, you are engaging in electronic media advertising and must comply with the requirements of both the State Bar Act and the Rules of Professional Conduct. Creating a Web site on the Internet gives you the capability of providing text concerning legal services and related photos, graphics, video and audio. All of these are governed by the State Bar Act and the CRPC.”[10]

 

NOTE: The key to protecting yourself is to make your blog, website or social media page informational.  The more that you seem like a journalist, the more protection.  Moreover, you are more likely to build a following if your page is informational.   You are reporting on your particular area of law, and as frequently happens on the news, you are also a commentator.  Another key point is to have the appropriate notice/disclaimer, so as not to create an advertisement on your website, blog or social media page.

 

 

The Effect of Globalization:

ADVERTISING IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS

On advertising issues, California Practice Guide: Professional Responsibility states:

 “Advertising in other jurisdictions: There is no clear answer as to which rules apply when you advertise on the Internet in other jurisdictions. A good guideline is to comply with the most stringent rules in each state where you are licensed to practice or where your firm has an office. See discussion at2:592.10 ff. Simply establishing a Web site that can be accessed by potential clients in another state should not require you to comply with that state’s rules. However, if any member of your firm is licensed in another state, that alone could trigger the need to comply with that state’s rules.”[11]

 

NOTE: In California, an out-of-state attorney who is not licensed to practice in this state can be subject to Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6126, “Unauthorized practice or attempted practice; advertising or holding out; penalties, ” which states:

“(a) Any person advertising or holding himself or herself out as practicing or entitled to practice law or otherwise practicing law who is not an active member of the State Bar, or otherwise authorized pursuant to statute or court rule to practice law in this state at the time of doing so, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in a county jail by a fine of up to one thousand dollars ($1, 000), or by both that fine and imprisonment. Upon a second or subsequent conviction, the person shall be confined in a county jail for not less than 90 days, except in an unusual case where the interests of justice would be served by imposition of a lesser sentence or a fine. If the court imposes only a fine or a sentence of less than 90 days for a second or subsequent conviction under this subdivision, the court shall state the reasons for its sentencing choice on the record.”[12]

 

CRPC Rule 1-300 Unauthorized Practice of Law also addresses this issue. Rule 1-300 (B) states: “a member shall not practice law in a jurisdiction where to do so would be in violation of regulations of the profession in that jurisdiction.”[13]

 

 WEBSITE GUIDELINES

 1.1.     MAKE IT INFORMATIVE

 

NOTE: Advertising by electronic media that depicts the result of a case or cases should disclose “the factual and legal circumstances that justify the result portrayed in the message, including the basis for liability and the nature of injury or damage sustained, or the advertisement must state that the result portrayed in the advertisement was dependent on the facts of that case, and that the results will differ if based on different facts.”[14]

 

Avoid Solicitation:

 The solicitation statute provides:

 “(C) A solicitation shall not be made by or on behalf of a member or law firm to a prospective client with whom the member or law firm has no family or prior professional relationship, unless the solicitation is protected from abridgment by the Constitution of the United States or by the Constitution of the State of California. A solicitation to a former or present client in the discharge of a member’s or law firm’s professional duties is not prohibited.”[15]

It further provides:

“(D) A communication or a solicitation (as defined herein) shall not: …

(2) Contain any matter, or present or arrange any matter in a manner or format which is false, deceptive, or which tends to confuse, deceive, or mislead the public; or…

(4) Fail to indicate clearly, expressly, or by context, that it is a communication or solicitation, as the case may be; or

(5) Be transmitted in any manner which involves intrusion, coercion, duress, compulsion, intimidation, threats, or vexatious or harassing conduct.”[16]

1.2.     COVER YOUR BASES

Clearly Label Any Communication

To avoid running afoul of Rule 1-400, clearly label your non-advertisement communication as a “newsletter.”

As noted in Rule 1-400(e)(5) states:

“A ‘communication, ’ except professional announcements, seeking professional employment for pecuniary gain, which is transmitted by mail or equivalent means which does not bear the word ‘Advertisement, ’ ‘Newsletter’ or words of similar import in 12 point print on the first page.”[17]

 

Add a Disclaimer

The California Practice Guide: Professional Responsibility provides a sample disclaimer to address the issues above.  It states:

 

DISCLAIMER:

This Web site is a public resource of general information concerning our firm. It is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date.  The Web site is not intended to be a source of advertising, solicitation or legal advice.  Links on the Web site are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of the linked entities.  The lawyers identified on the Web site are licensed to practice law in the following states: (IDENTIFY STATES) and nowhere else. The Firm does not intend to represent anyone desiring representations in a state where this Web site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state. [18]

 

1.3.     AVOID TOO MUCH INTERACTIVITY

For law sites, avoid the type of interactivity by which you might be considered to be giving legal advice to people outside your jurisdiction, and avoid active pursuit of prospective clients using electronic media that resembles “live, in-person” communication.[19]

The rule is, the more interactive the communication with the prospective client, the more likely that the attorney is involved in solicitation and advertising to the individual.  Solicitation subjects attorneys to the stringent rules and disclosures described above.

Also, it is suggested that attorneys refrain from providing legal advice over the internet unless they intend to establish an attorney-client relationship, which will trigger other regulations and procedures in addition to the ones described above.

FINAL THOUGHTS ON CONTENT

As noted above, make your page informative.  First, it will be more effective.  Second, it will protect you.  The more you make your social media page informational rather than a pure solicitation, the more protection you have.  Finally, do not use terms of art (such as the word “specialist”), or phrases that are misleading.  For example, an attorney who described himself in an online advertisement as a DUI “specialist” was subject to discipline.[20] It is unclear whether there would have been a different result if the phrase was used on an informational website instead of on an actual advertisement.

If you are only licensed in California, look at these rules and include the appropriate disclaimer on your site.  If you are licensed in other states, look to those states to see if they have more stringent rules.

The ABA Web site has a state by state breakdown with links to most state bar associations and state ethics rules governing lawyer advertising www.abanet.org/barserv/stlobar.html (bar associations); www.abanet.org/legalservices/clientdevelopment/adrules.html (advertising rules).

 

An ABA article titled “Ethical Considerations for Promoting Your Practice Online” suggests that, until the laws in different jurisdictions are clearly defined and “harmonized”, websites and other online advertising tools (which includes social media sites) “should provide:

(1)  an explanation of where the attorney is licensed to practice law;

(2)  a description of where the attorney maintains law offices and actually practices law;

(3)  an explanation of any limitation on the courts in which the attorney is willing to appear; and

(4)   a statement that the attorney does not seek to represent anyone based solely on a visit to the attorney’s website.”[21]



[1] Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6157.

[2] CA ST RPC Rule 1-400.

[3] Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6158.3.

[4] Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code. § 6157 (c) & (d).

[5]  Vapnek, Tuft, Peck and Wiener, California Practice Guide: Professional Responsibility § 2:533 (2009 ed).

[7]  Vapnek, et al., California Practice Guide: Professional Responsibility at 2:534 and 2:534.5.

[8]  Id.

[9] Id. at 2:538.

[10] Id. at  2:538-2:540.

[11] Id. at 2:541.

[12] Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 6126.

[13] CA ST RPC Rule 1-300.

[14] Id.

[15] CA ST RPC Rule 1-400(c).

[16] CA ST RPC Rule 1-400(d).

[17] CA ST RPC Rule 1-400.

[18] Cal. Prac. Guide Prof. Resp. Form 2:A.

[19] CA ST RPC Rule 1-400.

[20] Id. at 2:537.5.

[21] Richard M. Goehler, Ethical Considerations for Promoting Your Practice Online, ABA Litigation News, (2010). (http://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/litigationnews/trial_skills/070710-ethics-promoting-law-practice-online.html)

© 2011, S. Michael Kernan

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 188 user reviews.

We’ve featured a few articles now on the contentious issue of who owns your social media contacts. Jonathan Barrick has some useful comments on “Who Owns the Account? Navigating the Minefield of Social Ownership.” The article provides tips on how to assess the issue when part of your job responsibility includes maintaining a social media presence.

Average Rating: 4.7 out of 5 based on 199 user reviews.

Social Media’s influence in marketing is only going to continue to grow. Social media offers an excellent way for marketers to connect with consumers and allows for fairly easy tracking of that contact. Lewis Humphries looks at “The Power of Social Media: Influencing Trading and the Markets.”

Average Rating: 4.9 out of 5 based on 272 user reviews.

The Chief Justice of the Canadian Supreme Court recently spoke to a group of university students about the important role social media could play in the justice system. The Chief Justice comments on the role social media can play within courts and as an integral part of what we now think of as media in a larger context. Read all of her remarks in Mike Blanchfield’s article: “Chief Justice Muses About the Impact of Tweets, Facebook, and Others.”

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 214 user reviews.

It may seem like a lot of work to track all the changes in social media law with so many stories and cases emerging every day, but it’s money and time well spent. Jon Chavez’s article, “Law’s Stance on Social Media Fluid, Firms Told, ” points out why. It’s important that a company’s social media policies keep pace with changes in the law.

Average Rating: 4.5 out of 5 based on 182 user reviews.

Last Friday, the New Jersey law firm Scarinci Hollenbeck announced the launch of their new website. Now visitors to the site can also access the firm’s Facebook, Twitter, Google +, LinkedIn accounts, and YouTube channel. Read the press release here. The firm describes the new site as a “unique social and digital media experience.”

Average Rating: 4.8 out of 5 based on 293 user reviews.